Self-reported eye diseases among American Indian individuals with type 2 diabetes from the northern Midwest
Purpose. To determine the prevalence of self-reported eye diseases and self-reported utilization of dilated eye exams among a sample of American Indian (AI) individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Methods. AI adults with type 2 diabetes utilizing health care at two reservation clinics were randomly sampled and recruited for interviewer-assisted paper surveys. The prevalence of eye diseases was compared across gender, age, income, and educational attainment.
Results. The prevalence of self-reported diabetic retinopathy, cataract, macular degeneration, and glaucoma were 9.4%, 26.7%, 5.2%, and 10.6% respectively, and 59.2% reported past year dilated eye exams. Older participants were more likely to report cataract (p < 0.001) and glaucoma (p = .003). Those with lower income were more likely to report cataract (p = 0.001).
Conclusions. Rates of self-reported eye diseases in this sample were higher, and dilated eye exams lower than other samples of the general United States population with diabetes, suggesting improvement can be made to improve the provision of care for AI individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Ryskulova A, Turczyn K, Makuc DM, et al. Self-reported age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in the United States: results of the 2002 national health interview survey. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 454-61.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of visual impairment and selected eye diseases among persons aged >/=50 years with and without diabetes-United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53: 1069-71.
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 552-63.
Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005-2008. JAMA 2010; 304: 649-56.
Schiller JS, Lucas JW, Peregoy JA. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2011. Vital Health Stat 2012; 10, 1-218.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
Barnes PM, Adams PF, Powell-Griner E. Health characteristics of the American Indian or Alaska Native adult population: United States, 2004-2008 National health statistics reports; no 20. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2010.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011: With special feature on socioeconomic status and health. Hyattsville, MD, 2012.
O’Connell J, Yi R, Wilson C, et al. Racial disparities in health status: A comparison of the morbidity among American Indian and U.S. adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1463-70.
Haymes SA, Leston JD, Ferucci ED, et al. Visual impairment and eye care among Alaska Native people. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009; 16: 163-74.
Berinstein DM, Stahn RM, Welty TK, et al. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors among Sioux Indians. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 757-9.
Dorf A, Ballintine EJ, Bennett PH, Miller M. Retinopathy in Pima Indians. Relationships in glucose level, duration of diabetes, age at diagnosis of diabetes, and age at examination in a population with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1976; 25: 554-60.
Lee ET, Lee VS, Kingsley RM, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in Oklahoma Indians with NIDDM: incidence and risk factors. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1620-7.
Lee ET, Russell D, Morris T, et al. Visual impairment and eye abnormalities in Oklahoma Indians. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 1699-1704.
Looker HC, Krakoff J, Knowler WC, et al. Longitudinal studies of incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy assessed by retinal photography in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 320-6.
Nagi DK, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, et al. Diabetic retinopathy assessed by fundus photography in Pima Indians with impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM. Diabetic Med 1997; 14: 449-56.
Newell SW, Tolbert B, Bennett J, Parsley TL. The prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy among Indians of southwest Oklahoma. J Okla State Med Assoc 1989; 82: 414-24.
West KM, Erdreich LJ, Stober JA. A detailed study of risk factors for retinopathy and nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes 1980; 29: 501-8.
Naqshbandi M, Harris SB, Esler JG, Antwi-Nsiah F. Global complication rates of type 2 diabetes in Indigenous peoples: a comprehensive review. Diabetes Res Clin Pr 2008; 82: 1-17.
Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Evans J. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in various ethnic groups: a worldwide perspective. Surv Ophthalmol 2012; 57: 347-70.
Walls ML, Aronson BD, Soper GV, Johnson-Jennings MD. The prevalence and correlates of mental and emotional health among American Indian adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educator 2014; 40: 319-28.
Oster RT, Virani S, Strong D, et al. Diabetes care and health status of First Nations individuals with type 2 diabetes in Alberta. Can Fam Physician 2009; 55: 386-93.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2015. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: Supplement 1., S1-S93.
Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, et al. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government: implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 909-17.
Chou CF, Sherrod CE, Zhang X, et al. Barriers to eye care among people aged 40 years and older with diagnosed diabetes, 2006–2010. Diabetes Care 2013; 37: 180-8.
Silver K, Williams M, Macario E. The national eye health education program: increasing awareness of diabetic eye disease among American Indians and Alaska natives. Ethnic Dis 2006; 16: 920-5.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
1. The author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: 1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.